Aerobatics Server ACRO E-mail Archive Thread: [Acro] 2002 intermediate known, now I'm curious [International Aerobatic Club] [Articles etc] [Communications] [Contest and Patch Information] [Aviation Organizations] [Other Aerobatics Info] [Aerobatics Images] [Other Aerobatics Links] [Other Aviation Info (including weather)] [Search ACRO Website] Disclaimer: These aerobatics pages are developed by individual IAC members and do not represent official IAC policy or opinion.

[Usage Statistics]

ACRO E-mail Archive Thread: [Acro] 2002 intermediate known, now I'm curious

Thread: [Acro] 2002 intermediate known, now I'm curious

Message: [Acro] 2002 intermediate known, now I'm curious

Follow-Up To: ACRO Email list (for List Members only)

From: Dan Holden <dholden at lanl.gov>

Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 18:34:05 UTC

Message:

  Dear Cognoscenti,

I see now the changes made from the proposed to the final known are to swap 
the hammerhead and the humpty, then delay the cuban until after the 
split-S.  The comment was made that the changes make the sequence more 
flyable.  As someone who knows little more than the concept of energy 
management in sequence design (and needs to know more), why/how do those 
changes make the sequence more flyable, and how is that determined?  Did 
someone go fly it both ways, or are the changes based upon past experience, 
theory, etc.?  Also, what are the basic parameters to optimize when 
learning how to design one's free sequence.

Dan
Pitts S1, Intermediate wannabe
IAC #1,234,543,987,504.041

If you have aerobatics related information that you would like to make available, please contact me at the email address below.
	Last Update: Sun Oct 17 15:33:30 2004
© Dr. Günther Eichhorn	Springer 233 Spring Street New York, NY 10013 USA, Email Guenther Eichhorn