Acro Image

Aerobatics Server

ACRO E-mail Archive Thread: [Acro] Re: IAC rules amok?? -- just another re ...

[International Aerobatic Club] [Communications] [Aerobatics Images]

Disclaimer: These aerobatics pages are developed by individual IAC members and do not represent official IAC policy or opinion.

[Usage Statistics]


ACRO E-mail Archive Thread: [Acro] Re: IAC rules amok?? -- just another re ...



                


Thread: [Acro] Re: IAC rules amok?? -- just another re ...

Message: [Acro] Re: IAC rules amok?? -- just another real world solution

Follow-Up To: ACRO Email list (for List Members only)

From: Jim Nahom <califprint at earthlink.net>

Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2002 18:21:37 UTC


Message:

Just wondering but is there ANYBODY out there that thinks the new 
primary category is a good idea?

Jim Nahom
Chapter 49

Dr. Guenther Eichhorn wrote:

>Hi all,
>
>I second that.  I don't think that the new primary category is 
>the right way to go.  It leaves out the spin which is essential 
>to aerobatics, and it includes a composite maneuver, the half 
>cuban, which shouldn't be in a beginners sequence.
>
>Guenther
>
>
>------ Original Message ------
>
>In message <3C884AA7.3080103 at earthlink.net>, Jim Nahom writes:
>
>>--------------020309030408070802000803
>>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
>>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>>
>>Good for you Kurt, and the Chapter 69 BOD. I have not spoken with 
>>anybody  that is actually in favor of having the new primary category.
>>
>>Jim Nahom
>>Vice President Chapter 49
>>
>>Kurt Otto Haukohl wrote:
>>
>>>NOTE: although we will be flying the new IAC Primary category and are 
>>>strong and enthusiastic supporters of grassroots aerobatics, we feel 
>>>that your safety is paramount. Many aerobatic maneuvers may result in 
>>>unintended spins, even though a given aircraft may not be certificated 
>>>for intentional spins. So, in the interest of safety, and at the 
>>>request of the Chapter 69 Board of Directors, we have applied for the 
>>>following supplemental contest rule: Any competitor who wishes to fly 
>>>in the Primary category (in which a spin is not required) must either: 
>>>1) provide evidence of prior aerobatic (not CFI) spin training, 2) 
>>>have flown before in an IAC competition flight requiring a spin (such 
>>>as Basic), or 3) be willing to fly with a safety pilot at the 2002 
>>>CopperState contest. If you have any questions regarding this policy, 
>>>or want to inquire about arranging for a safety pilot, please contact 
>>>the CD with your details and questions as soon as possible. Thank you 
>>>for your understanding!
>>>
>>
>>
>>--------------020309030408070802000803
>>Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
>>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>>
>><html>
>><head>
>></head>
>><body>
>>Good for you Kurt, and the Chapter 69 BOD. I have not spoken with <u>anybody</
>>u>
>>that is actually in favor of having the new primary category.<br>
>><br>
>>Jim Nahom<br>
>>Vice President Chapter 49<br>
>><br>
>>Kurt Otto Haukohl wrote:<br>
>><blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:5.1.0.14.0.20020307205600.00b8a008 at pop.sac.s
>>ticare.com"><font color="#ff0000"><br>
>>NOTE: although we will be flying the new IAC Primary category and are strong
>>and enthusiastic supporters of grassroots aerobatics, we feel that <u>your
>>safety</u> is paramount. Many aerobatic maneuvers may result in unintended
>>spins, even though a given aircraft may not be certificated for intentional
>>spins. So, in the interest of safety, and at the request of the Chapter 69
>>Board of Directors, we have applied for the following supplemental contest
>>rule: Any competitor who wishes to fly in the Primary category (in which
>>a spin is <u>not</u> required) must <u>either</u>: 1) provide evidence of
>>prior aerobatic (not CFI) spin training, 2) have flown before in an IAC compet
>>ition
>>flight requiring a spin (such as Basic), or 3) be willing to fly with a safety
>>pilot at the 2002 CopperState contest. If you have any questions regarding
>>this policy, or want to inquire about arranging for a safety pilot, please 
>>contact the </font><font color="#0000ff"><u>CD</u></font><font color="#ff0000"
>>
>>with your details and questions as soon as possible. Thank you for your under
>>standing!<br>
>> </font></blockquote>
>> <br>
>> </body>
>> </html>
>>
>>--------------020309030408070802000803--
>>
>
>
>

Attachement 1: part2.html


                


© Dr. Günther Eichhorn
Retired
Email Guenther Eichhorn