ACRO E-mail Archive Thread: [Acro] Re: IAC rulse amok?? -- just another re ...
[International Aerobatic Club] [Communications] [Aerobatics Images]
Disclaimer: These aerobatics pages are developed by individual IAC members and do not represent official IAC policy or opinion.
Thread: [Acro] Re: IAC rulse amok?? -- just another re ...
Message: [Acro] Re: IAC rulse amok?? -- just another real world solution
Follow-Up To: ACRO Email list (for List Members only)
From: "Ron Spencer" <splitimagewing at earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2002 17:11:44 UTC
Good question. The reason is there are no FAR requirements for this, (unless you are a CFI). The "endorsement" would be meaningless. -RS- ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gibbons" <gibbons at cox-internet.com> To: <acro at gf24.de> Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2002 11:43 AM Subject: [Acro] Re: IAC rulse amok?? -- just another real world solution > What would be wrong with requiring a logbook endorsement for spin training > prior to letting someone enter a contest, even in the primary class? From > what I've read a pilot is much more likely to enter an inadvertent spin than > they are to disable an airplane, yet we're required to wear parachutes and > not required to show that we've received adequate spin training. > > I'm sure this is not a new question. What is the IAC position on this? > > Regards, > > Chip Gibbons >