Acro Image

Aerobatics Server

ACRO E-mail Archive Thread: [Acro] Re: IAC rulse amok?? -- just another re ...

[International Aerobatic Club] [Communications] [Aerobatics Images]

Disclaimer: These aerobatics pages are developed by individual IAC members and do not represent official IAC policy or opinion.

[Usage Statistics]


ACRO E-mail Archive Thread: [Acro] Re: IAC rulse amok?? -- just another re ...



                


Thread: [Acro] Re: IAC rulse amok?? -- just another re ...

Message: [Acro] Re: IAC rulse amok?? -- just another real world solution

Follow-Up To: ACRO Email list (for List Members only)

From: "Ron Spencer" <splitimagewing at earthlink.net>

Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2002 17:11:44 UTC


Message:

  Good question.  The reason is there are no FAR requirements for this,
(unless you are a CFI).  The "endorsement" would be meaningless.

-RS-


----- Original Message -----
From: "Gibbons" <gibbons at cox-internet.com>
To: <acro at gf24.de>
Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2002 11:43 AM
Subject: [Acro] Re: IAC rulse amok?? -- just another real world solution


> What would be wrong with requiring a logbook endorsement for spin training
> prior to letting someone enter a contest, even in the primary class?  From
> what I've read a pilot is much more likely to enter an inadvertent spin
than
> they are to disable an airplane, yet we're required to wear parachutes and
> not required to show that we've received adequate spin training.
>
> I'm sure this is not a new question.  What is the IAC position on this?
>
> Regards,
>
> Chip Gibbons
>



                


© Dr. Günther Eichhorn
Retired
Email Guenther Eichhorn