Acro Image

Aerobatics Server

ACRO E-mail Archive Thread: [Acro] Re: Section 91.303

[International Aerobatic Club] [Communications] [Aerobatics Images]

Disclaimer: These aerobatics pages are developed by individual IAC members and do not represent official IAC policy or opinion.

[Usage Statistics]

ACRO E-mail Archive Thread: [Acro] Re: Section 91.303


Thread: [Acro] Re: Section 91.303

Message: [Acro] Re: Section 91.303

Follow-Up To: ACRO Email list (for List Members only)

From: "Greg Dungan" <dungangd at>

Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 15:59:12 UTC


  Contact your local FSDO and get a waiver for your proposed practice area and 
then you won't have to worry about the definition of "congested" as used in 
91.303.  When the FSDO approves the box (contact Bill Finagin at 
WFinagin at if you have troubles), then the "FAA" has authorized 
you to perform aerobatics in that area, as long as you use it IAW the 

Greg Dungan
IAC 16628, Ch 58
Pitts S-1S+, N16628
National Judge
Patuxent River, MD

>From: "Gibbons" <gibbons at>
>Reply-To: <gibbons at>
>To: <acro at>
>Subject: [Acro] Section 91.303
>Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 21:08:39 -0600
>Regarding the FAR's for aerobatic flight:
>"No person may operate an aircraft in aerobatic flight a) over any 
>area of a city, town, or settlement"
>How does the FAA define "congested?"  If there are a couple of houses
>outside town in the practice area is that "congested?"
>"Within 4 nautical miles of the center line of any Federal airway"
>Does this include Jet airways?  The letter of the rule implies that this is
>the case, but how much sense does that make?  I don't think that even I can
>screw up enough to put a Decathlon into the flight levels.
>I've found the PERFECT place to practice, but it's only 2 nm from a high
>altitude airway, and there is a single house just outside the boundary of
>the practice area.  Would you or wouldn't you?  Would you be legal if you
>Chip Gibbons

Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at


© Dr. Günther Eichhorn
Email Guenther Eichhorn