Acro Image

Aerobatics Server

ACRO E-mail Archive Thread: [Acro] RE: Aerobatics Now Illegal In Canada

[International Aerobatic Club] [Communications] [Aerobatics Images]

Disclaimer: These aerobatics pages are developed by individual IAC members and do not represent official IAC policy or opinion.

[Usage Statistics]


ACRO E-mail Archive Thread: [Acro] RE: Aerobatics Now Illegal In Canada



                


Thread: [Acro] RE: Aerobatics Now Illegal In Canada

Message: [Acro] RE: Aerobatics Now Illegal In Canada

Follow-Up To: ACRO Email list (for List Members only)

From: "Max Braude" <skybird at optushome.com.au>

Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2002 00:22:27 UTC


Message:

  Hell - a free trip  - to Ottawa - good grief!

Not many other place I would rather not got to for free.....

;-))

Max Braude
skybird at optushome.com.au


-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Boyd [mailto:aboyd at igs.net]
Sent: Saturday, April 06, 2002 10:44 PM
To: skybird at optushome.com.au; IAC Acro List
Subject: Re: [Acro] Aerobatics Now Illegal In Canada


Continuing through the looking glass, with it's usual regard for
the taxpayer's dollars, Transport Canada Aviation Enforcement
is paying for a substantial number of American aerobatic
pilots to travel to Ottawa to discuss this bizarre interpretation
of the Canadian Aviation Regulations.

--
aboyd at igs.net


----- Original Message -----
From: "Max Braude" <skybird at optushome.com.au>
To: "Andrew Boyd" <aboyd at igs.net>; "IAC Acro List" <acro at gf24.de>
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 11:35 PM
Subject: RE: [Acro] Aerobatics Now Illegal In Canada


> Lets give 3 cheers to the beaurocrats
>
>
> Again
>
>
>
> Max Braude
> skybird at optushome.com.au
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Boyd [mailto:aboyd at igs.net]
> Sent: Saturday, April 06, 2002 1:04 PM
> To: IAC Acro List
> Cc: aboyd at igs.net
> Subject: [Acro] Aerobatics Now Illegal In Canada
>
>
> According to Canadian Aviation Regulation (CAR) 602.27(c) flight
> visibility of 3 miles is required to perform an aerobatic maneuver in
> Canada.  Ok.
>
> According to CAR 101.01(1) Flight Visibility is defined as "the visibility
> forward from the cockpit of an aircraft in flight".  Sure.
>
> So far, so good.
>
> However, I have in my possession a statement by a Transport Canada
Aviation
> (think Canadian FAA) Enforcement Supervisor that this 3 miles flight
> visibility
> out the front cockpit must be available DURING EVERY INSTANT of an
> aerobatic maneuver.
>
> Let's think about the implications of this for a moment.  If we commence
any
> vertical aerobatic maneuver - say, a loop - at the minimum altitude
> specified
> by CAR 602.27(d) - 2,000 AGL - then if our loop has a diameter of 1,000
feet
> then when we are 2,500 AGL we can reasonably expect to be vertical,
pointed
> straight up.
>
> At this instant, according to Transport Canada Enforcement, we still need
> 3 miles flight visibility.  This means no cloud ceiling less than 3 miles
or
> 18,000 feet directly above us.
>
> So, to perform a loop in Canada, you now need a cloud ceiling of at least
> 2,500 + 18,000 = 20,500 AGL.
>
> Passing through the inverted, life is good.  We have 3 miles flight
> visibility
> horizontally.
>
> However, things get sticky on the vertical downline of our nice round
loop.
>
> At 2,500 AGL we can logically be expected to be pointed straight down
> at the ground.
>
> Oops.  Transport Canada Aviation Enforcement wants us to have 3 miles
> flight visibility at this instant, too, and we only have 2.500 feet (to
the
> ground)
> or less than 1/2 mile.  That's IFR, according to Transport Canada Aviation
> Enforcement.
>
> So, on the vertical downline, we need to have 18,000 feet between us and
> the ground.  This means that we must now commence a loop in Canada at
> no lower than 17,500 AGL.
>
> Oops.  If we start a loop at 17,500 AGL we now need to have a cloud
ceiling
> of no less than 36,000 AGL.
>
> Of course, we will also need oxygen for the pilot, and a turbocharger for
> the
> engine, and a waiver for the class A airspace that we will be in, VFR
> performing
> aerobatics to keep Transport Canada Aviation Enforcement happy.
>
> The above being perhaps theoretically possible, but practically unlikely,
> aerobatics - at least, aerobatics involving vertical lines - are now
> effectively
> illegal in Canada, unless you wish to run afoul of Transport Canada
Aviation
> Enforcement, which is really not a good idea.
>
> Looking on the bright side, I guess you can still do a steep turn with
more
> than
> 60 degrees of bank, though.
>
> --
> aboyd at igs.net   ATP
>
>
>


                


© Dr. Günther Eichhorn
Retired
Email Guenther Eichhorn