|
Aerobatics Server
ACRO E-mail Archive Thread: [Acro] RE: IAC vs. CIVA RULES [International Aerobatic Club] [Communications] [Aerobatics Images] Disclaimer: These aerobatics pages are developed by individual IAC members and do not represent official IAC policy or opinion. |
[Usage Statistics] |
Thread: [Acro] RE: IAC vs. CIVA RULES
Message: [Acro] RE: IAC vs. CIVA RULES
Follow-Up To: ACRO Email list (for List Members only)
From: "autotech at flash.net" <autotech@flash.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 00:54:15 UTC
Birdie, This ought to trigger some fun... For what it's worth, my impression of the CIVA rules is that they are far more sparse and depend upon frequent interpretation by juries, where we have attempted to spell out as many interpretations as possible. A CIVA jury may interpret them differently than we have, but not always. While there are some odd twists in our interpretation, by and large it seems like a good thing to have more explicit explanations and standardization from one contest to the next rather than hoping that the jury at one contest will interpret the rule the same as at another contest. I would support a move to adopt most and possibly all CIVA rules where they were specific. It is a unnecessary to have different rules on such things as breaks, wing wags, and scoring outs. Don Original Message: ----------------- From: PittsS2Birdie at aol.com Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2002 20:08:20 EDT To: acro at gf24.de Subject: [Acro] IAC vs. CIVA RULES Just got the SA magazine....Great work. Here goes...I propose we can the IAC rules, adopt the CIVA rules and just print the magazine. Birdie Saurenman -------------------------------------------------------------------- mail2web - Check your email from the web at http://mail2web.com/ .