ACRO E-mail Archive Thread: [Acro] Re: S-2B engine temps?
[International Aerobatic Club] [Communications] [Aerobatics Images]
Disclaimer: These aerobatics pages are developed by individual IAC members and do not represent official IAC policy or opinion.
Thread: [Acro] Re: S-2B engine temps?
Message: [Acro] Re: S-2B engine temps?
Follow-Up To: ACRO Email list (for List Members only)
From: "Terry Burch" <zlinman.woody at verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 16:53:06 UTC
Doug, this is pretty normal for an injected engine. It has to do with un equal cylinder flow. Tons of reasons why, none you can do anything about. If the nozzles were perfect, you get all cylinders to peak at the same time. The temps would still be different. No one used to worry about it because we never had instruments accurate enough to tell. Woody----- Original Message ----- From: <DSowder at aol.com> To: <acro at gf24.de> Sent: Sunday, September 22, 2002 10:22 PM Subject: [Acro] S-2B engine temps? > Is anyone else flying an S-2B with a 6-cylinder engine analyzer? I put a JPI > EDM-700 analyzer on my B at the same time the engine was rebuilt, and have > put 420 hours on it since. The No. 1 cylinder always has the coldest EGT and > CHT, no matter what the power setting or how I lean. EGT is about 60 to 90 > deg. colder than #4 (usually the hottest), and CHT is about 30 or 40 deg. > colder. This despite swapping injector nozzles, EGT and CHT sensors. The No. > 1 cylinder seems to peak at about the same mixture setting as the other > cylinders, it's just always colder. > > For some reason this is bothering me more these days. It would seem that the > only answer is that #1 is getting less air for some reason, but it seems that > would make it run richer and thus peak much later (i.e. with the mixture > control pulled further out). It's run this way since "sort of new"; I never > flew the airplane before this engine rebuild. The engine is strong and > smooth, and compression is excellent. Just curious to know if anyone else > sees a similar temperature spread. > > Thanks, > Doug Sowder >