![]()
|
Aerobatics Server
ACRO E-mail Archive Thread: IAC Elite Airshows [International Aerobatic Club] [Communications] [Aerobatics Images] Disclaimer: These aerobatics pages are developed by individual IAC members and do not represent official IAC policy or opinion. |
[Usage Statistics] |
Thread: IAC Elite Airshows
Message: IAC Elite Airshows
Follow-Up To: ACRO Email list (for List Members only)
From: TwoWing6 at ix.netcom.com (Kurt-Otto Haukohl)
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 1996 17:04:41 UTC
Lois Rose HI. We don't have an area Director. Doc Harvey passed away this year. Yes, someone was appointed for us about 1500 miles from here. I never met him but he sounds like a nice guy. OUR director never mentioned the "Waiver of Qualification Flights" rule, because it still is NOT in the rule book. This is an interpretation just in the Magazine. NO RULE EXISTS. Suggest you read 5.2.1. and then tell me how one could interpret a waiver of this rule anywhere else in the Red Book. It would be nice if the IAC would publish the proposed rules before they are enacted. In this case, it still would not have done any good. NO RULE EXISTS. We can't find any attempt to publish this change prior to it taking place. Please tell me where this interpretation of rule 5.6.6. was ever mentioned? I can't find it. So anyway, if you can find any hint of "Waiver of Qualification Flight" language ANYWHERE in any magazine ( until after the fact ), I will eat it. It is important for you to understand that We/I am not against, nor do I oppose the Four Minute. I do oppose the interuption of a contest for an airshow by a guest appearance, whenever any lower categories will be sacrificed. We have large contests with 40-60 pilots and usually have a struggle just getting the three typical flights completed. If people want this type of thing, that is fine too. Our chapter however, would not go out and buy trophies for Star appearances, interupt the contest, and then not ZERO the three previously skipped programs for an incoming HALO. OUR local HALOs fly the entire program and work the entire contest... hard. I guess we are just flat out of RED CARPET down here. Perhaps we are spoiled by our real HALOs here that work harder than anybody else. Our HALOs set an example to be admired, and are in my opinion the real HALOs in this sport. If and when we do get to do the Four Minute down here, it is always because all of the other flight programs were completed! Anyway, sorry Lois but you can read the Red Book until your purple, NO RULE EXISTS to support what is mentioned in the magazine. Perhaps I was not clear. THE RULE STILL AIN'T THERE... IT IS ONLY MENTIONED IN THE MAGAZINE and our RULES CHAIRMAN THINKS IT IS. WHAT WE ARE HAVING IS FAILURE TO COMMUNICATE. PLEASE READ SPORT AEROBATICS, NOVEMBER ISSUE PAGE 8, COL #1 "IAC RULES CHANGES FOR 96", PARAGRAPH 3., THEN, INTERPRET 5.2.1. AND 5.6.6. AND EXPLAIN HOW YOU ARRIVE AT "WAIVED QUALIFICATION FLIGHTS". Finally how?, when they have thier first contest in Podunk, Wyoming, is the contest jury going to know WHO is capable of flying an Unlimited Four Minute Free? The fact is, if someone shows up with an FAI card and wants to fly, I bet they launch him. So... on to the next 50 problems. WHO is pre-qualified? How do you determine if for instance Sean Tucker, (who never flew Unlimited) is OK to fly? How to you PREVENT a new BASIC pilot with an Xtra from getting his qualification flight waived? Mind you in Pudunk, only 10 guys showed up, and they are now fired up an ready for the airshow. My guess is that this could be a "rule interpretation" that will require plenty of body bags. In conclusion again. This was an unecessary rule change/interpretation. The Red Book was not broke and did not need fixin. Kurt Otto Haukohl Erlinda Ibe Haukohl Post Office Box 131872 Avanzata AirWork Houston, Texas 77219-1872 West Houston Airport (IWS) (713) 578-8056 FAX 578-8266 Hanger (713) 578-8054