ACRO E-mail Archive Thread: Pitts S2 AD 96-09-08
[International Aerobatic Club] [Communications] [Aerobatics Images]
Disclaimer: These aerobatics pages are developed by individual IAC members and do not represent official IAC policy or opinion.
|
|
Aerobatics Server
ACRO E-mail Archive Thread: Pitts S2 AD 96-09-08 [International Aerobatic Club] [Communications] [Aerobatics Images] Disclaimer: These aerobatics pages are developed by individual IAC members and do not represent official IAC policy or opinion. |
[Usage Statistics] |
Thread: Pitts S2 AD 96-09-08
Message: Pitts S2 AD 96-09-08
Follow-Up To: ACRO Email list (for List Members only)
From: "Dr. Guenther Eichhorn" <gei at head-cfa.harvard.edu>
Date: Fri, 10 May 1996 14:14:02 UTC
Hi,
Here is the full AD text. Although it is a final rule, there
is still the possibility to comment on it. I think this AD
goes too far. Has anybody heard of problems with S-2A's?
From what I heard this has affected only newer -B's. Does
anybody know whether Aviat changed any of their manufacturing
procedures at some time in the past? Have the manufacturing
procedures changed when the factory changed hands? My S-2A
for instance was manufactured by Aerotek. If this AD stands,
all S2 owner are in some kind of trouble. Inspections every
25 hours are quite a burden. If you have any information on
this subject, please let me know. Also if you know of
anybody who might know about it. I would like to collect
information about it to see whether there is anything we can
do. The comment period with the FAA runs till June 21, so we
have to get the information together fast.
Guenther
*******************************************************
[Federal Register: May 2, 1996 (Volume 61, Number 86)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 19540-19541]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[[Page 19540]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 95-CE-101-AD; Amendment 39-9584; AD 96-09-08]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Aviat Aircraft Inc. Models S-2A, S-2B,
and S-2S Airplanes (Formerly Pitts Models S-2A, S-2B, and S-2S
Airplanes)
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD) that
is applicable to Aviat Aircraft Inc., Models S-2A, S-2B, and S-2S
airplanes (formerly Pitts Models S-2A, S-2B, and S-2S airplanes). This
action requires inspecting the longerons aft of the rear cabane struts
for cracks, and if cracked, prior to further flight, repairing the
cracks. Reports of longeron failure caused by fatigue aft of the rear
cabane struts prompted this action. The actions specified by this AD
are intended to prevent cracking and subsequent failure of the
longerons resulting in possible loss of control of the airplane.
DATES: Effective May 20, 1996.
The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in
the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as
of May 20, 1996.
Comments for inclusion in the Rules Docket must be received on or
before June 21, 1996.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments in triplicate to the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Central Region, Office of the Assistant Chief
Counsel, Attention: Rules Docket 95-CE-101-AD, Room 1558, 601 E. 12th
Street, Kansas City, Missouri 64106.
Service information that applies to this AD may be obtained from
Aviat Aircraft Inc., The Airport-Box No. 11240, 672 South Washington
Street, Afton, Wyoming, 83110; telephone (307) 886-3151; facsimile
(307) 886-9674. This information may also be examined at the Federal
Aviation Administration (FAA), Central Region, Office of the Assistant
Chief Counsel, Attention: Rules Docket 95-CE-101-AD, Room 1558, 601 E.
12th Street, Kansas City, Missouri 64106; or at the Office of the
Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington,
DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Roger Caldwell, Project Engineer, FAA,
Denver Aircraft Certification Office, 5440 Roslyn St., suite 133,
Denver, Colorado, 80216; telephone (303) 286-5683; facsimile (303) 286-
5689.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA has been notified that an unsafe
condition may exist on Aviat Models S-2A, S-2B, and S-2S airplanes. The
owners/operators of several of these airplanes have reported cracking
and failure of the longerons aft of the rear cabane struts. One
incident reported that the cracked longeron made it very difficult to
control the airplane to a safe landing.
Aviat has issued service bulletin (SB) No. 24, dated February 8,
1996, which specifies inspecting for cracks and repairing any cracks
found in the longerons aft of the rear cabane struts.
After examining the circumstances and reviewing all available
information related to the incidents described above, the FAA has
determined that AD action should be taken in order to prevent cracking
and subsequent failure of the longerons resulting in possible loss of
control of the airplane.
Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to
exist or develop in other Aviat Models S-2A, S-2B, and S-2S airplanes
of the same type design registered for operation in the United States,
this AD requires:
--Inspecting the longerons around the rear cabane struts for cracks,
--If no cracks are found, repetitively inspecting, and
--If cracks are found during any inspection, prior to further flight,
contact the Denver ACO manager for an approved repair scheme
--Repair any cracks found according to the approved repair scheme
provided by the ACO manger
The inspections are to be done in accordance with the instructions
in the Aviat SB No. 24, dated February 8, 1996.
Since a situation exists that requires the immediate adoption of
this regulation, it is found that notice and opportunity for public
prior comment hereon are impracticable, and that good cause exists for
making this amendment effective in less than 30 days.
Comments Invited
Although this action is in the form of a final rule that involves
requirements affecting immediate flight safety and, thus, was not
preceded by notice and opportunity to comment, comments are invited on
this rule. Interested persons are invited to comment on this rule by
submitting such written data, views, or arguments as they may desire.
Communications should identify the Rules Docket number and be submitted
in triplicate to the address specified above. All communications
received on or before the closing date for comments will be considered,
and this rule may be amended in light of the comments received. Factual
information that supports the commenter's ideas and suggestions is
extremely helpful in evaluating the effectiveness of the AD action and
determining whether additional rulemaking action would be needed.
Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the rule that might
suggest a need to modify the rule. All comments submitted will be
available, both before and after the closing date for comments, in the
Rules Docket for examination by interested persons. A report that
summarizes each FAA-public contact concerned with the substance of this
AD will be filed in the Rules Docket.
Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments
submitted in response to this notice must submit a self-addressed,
stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments
to Docket No. 95-CE-101-AD.'' The postcard will be date stamped and
returned to the commenter.
The regulations adopted herein will not have substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in
accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this final
rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the
preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
The FAA has determined that this regulation is an emergency
regulation that must be issued immediately to correct an unsafe
condition in aircraft, and is not a significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866. It has been determined further that this action
involves an emergency regulation under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979). If it is determined that
this emergency regulation otherwise would be significant under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures, a final regulatory evaluation will
be prepared and placed in the Rules Docket (otherwise, an evaluation is
not required). A copy of it, if filed, may be obtained from the Rules
Docket.
[[Page 19541]]
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 USC 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding a new airworthiness directive
(AD) to read as follows:
96-09-08. Aviat Aircraft Inc.: Amendment 39-9584; Docket No. 95-CE-
101-AD.
Applicability: Models S-2A, S-2B, and S-2S airplanes (formerly
Pitts Models S-2A, S-2B, and S-2S airplanes), all serial numbers,
certificated in any category.
Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the
preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been
modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the
requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified,
altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of
this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an
alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (e) of
this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of
the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition
addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been
eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to
address it. Compliance: Required at the accumulation of 300 hours
total time-in-service (TIS), or within the next 25 hours TIS,
whichever occurs later, and thereafter at intervals not to exceed 25
hours TIS, unless already accomplished.
To prevent cracking and subsequent failure of the longerons,
which could result in loss of control of the airplane, accomplish
the following:
(a) Inspect (using a 10x magnifying glass) the longerons aft of
the rear cabane struts for cracks in accordance with paragraphs 1.)
through 5.) in the Aviat Service Bulletin (SB) No. 24, dated
February 8, 1996. If cracks are found during any inspection required
by this AD, prior to further flight, contact the Manager of the
Denver ACO for an approved repair scheme.
(b) Prior to further flight, repair any cracks found in
accordance with the approved repair scheme provided by the ACO
manager.
(c) Report the results of the initial inspection to the Manager
of the Denver Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA, Denver
Aircraft Certification Office, 5440 Roslyn St., suite 133, Denver,
Colorado, 80216, within 10 days of the inspection. The information
provided should include airplane model number, serial number,
registration number, location of cracks found, number of cracks, and
total TIS. Reporting requirements have been approved by the Office
of Management and Budget and assigned OMB control number 2120-0056.
(d) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with
sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where
the inspection requirements of this AD can be accomplished, provided
that aerobatic flying is prohibited.
(e) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
initial or repetitive compliance times that provides an equivalent
level of safety may be approved by the Manager, Denver Aircraft
Certification Office, FAA, Denver Aircraft Certification Office,
5440 Roslyn St., suite 133, Denver, Colorado, 80216. The request
shall be forwarded through an appropriate FAA Maintenance Inspector,
who may add comments and then send it to the Manager, Denver
Aircraft Certification Office.
Note 2: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be
obtained from the Denver Aircraft Certification Office.
(f) The inspections required by this AD shall be done in
accordance with Aviat Aircraft Inc. Service Bulletin No. 24, dated
February 8, 1996. This incorporation by reference was approved by
the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Copies may be obtained from Aviat Aircraft
Inc., The Airport-Box No. 1240, 672 South Washington Street, Afton,
Wyoming, 83110. Copies may be inspected at the FAA, Central Region,
Office of the Assistant Chief Counsel, Room 1558, 601 E. 12th
Street, Kansas City, Missouri, or at the Office of the Federal
Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
(g) This amendment (39-9584) becomes effective on May 20, 1996.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on April 22, 1996.
Henry A. Armstrong,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 96-10477 Filed 5-1-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-U