Acro Image

Aerobatics Server

ACRO E-mail Archive Thread: My 3cents worth

[International Aerobatic Club] [Communications] [Aerobatics Images]

Disclaimer: These aerobatics pages are developed by individual IAC members and do not represent official IAC policy or opinion.

[Usage Statistics]


ACRO E-mail Archive Thread: My 3cents worth



                


Thread: My 3cents worth

Message: My 3cents worth

Follow-Up To: ACRO Email list (for List Members only)

From: "Darwin Jones" <acropilot at msn.com>

Date: Sun, 20 Oct 1996 23:47:42 UTC


Message:

  Well I wasn't going a say nottin but after some thought, I just could not 
resist.

I personally would not be opposed increasing the difficulty for the 
Intermediate
because it is the final home for many people not wanting to go for a cat which
requires more performance and negitive stuff. but the increase should only be
if an increase in A/C performance is not  required. A 150hp Citab. should be
able complete the sequence. I don't want the sport to require more and more
A/C performance, Unlimited excluded. How about a rolling 90deg turn. 
Snap on a loop these would not require additional performance.

I see nothing wrong with the Sportsman of The current Basic cat.

As for the 20/20 thing. When we believe we have a quality problem we should
first find the root cause. I have been assisting and listening to some judges 
this year. Some people still don't know what a Decathlon looks like going 
straight up at zero lift. My vision meets the 20/20 thing corrected but I 
somtimes am not sure of an angle or how much over snapped somthing.
I believe that experience is more important.    

The bottom line is that there is no evidence that 20/20 is required. Get the 
data first then lets discuss it.

As for a C150 Aerobat, a call to Cessna to get the data confirmed that 
concern for the tail slide is the reason for no hammer, Yes it will hammer.

Darwin Jones


                


© Dr. Günther Eichhorn
Retired
Email Guenther Eichhorn