ACRO E-mail Archive Thread:
[International Aerobatic Club] [Communications] [Aerobatics Images]
Disclaimer: These aerobatics pages are developed by individual IAC members and do not represent official IAC policy or opinion.
Follow-Up To: ACRO Email list (for List Members only)
From: Phil Sisson <sissonp at wamusa.com>
Date: Mon, 05 May 1997 02:23:58 UTC
Klein Gilhousen wrote: > > Van, this is a typical bogus attempt by your FSDO to make more work for > themselves while causing you more grief. > > The controlling document, 8130.65 is quite clear on this issue. The > document describes four groups of experimental exhibition aircraft. > > Our group is group I, Performance Competition Aircraft. For this group is > says, "Proficiency area: A radius of 300 nautical miles from their > designated home base airport." > > For group II, Turbine Powered Aircraft, such as Mig-17, L-29, T-33, etc it > says "Proficiency area: Limited to a radius of 600 nautical miles from the > designated home airport. Proficiency flights will be limited to a non-stop > flight that begins and ends at the specified home airport, with sufficient > fuel reserve to meet the applicapable operating rules of part 91. > Operators who choose to fly to another airport within the assigned > proficiency area must notify their geographically responsible FSDO prior to > each proficiency flight away from their home airport." > > For group III, piston powered warbirds, it has similar words as group I > except that the radius is 600 miles for aircraft of greater than 800 hp. > > Group IV, other aircraft, says, "Proficiency area: Limited to a non-stop > flight that begins and ends at the specified home airport, with sufficient > fuel reserve to meet ...." > > So....if they had meant to limit us to a non-stop only flight to/from the > home airport, they would have said so as they did for Group II and Group > IV. But they didn't. The rules aren't such that everything not > specifically approved is forbidden. It's the other way around, i.e., > everything not specifically forbidden is approved. > > The guy you're talking to is just an idiot. If he won't give you an > appropriate set of operating limitations for your aircraft, just appeal it > to his boss, his boss's boss, etc till you find someone who knows how to > read. If you don't have a copy of 8130.65, you should get one and read the > rules to the guy. Hey, he doesn't really want to get a fax from you > everytime you go flying. He doesn't have the power to say no in any case. > Note that even for group II, the requirement is to _NOTIFY_ not get > permission. Even if you're flying a MiG-17 somewhere, all you need to do > is send the FSDO a fax and blast off. Just ask Dave Sutton about this for > more details. > > The FSDO really has no discretionary power to give you this kind of grief. > The 8130.65 document spells out in great detail exactly what each paragraph > of the operation limitations should say. There is a list of possible > paragraphs and a table that says, for each group, which paragraphs should > be included. Group I phase 2 gets paragraph 33 for proficiency area > description, and does _NOT_ get paragraph 34 or 36 which are the ones that > limit you to non-stop flights to/from your home airport. > > Klein Gilhousen > > At 7:32 AM -0600 5/4/97, Van Thurston wrote: > >Greetings all. > >I would like to get input from others regarding the way that local FAA > >FISDO's > >are administering the operating limitations on > >Foreign manufactured aerobatic aircraft. I have had discussions with several > >FAA inspectors, aircraft owners and others and all seen to operate under a > >different assumption as to what a Class 1 Phase 2 limitation should be. Class > >1 is acro types and phase 2 is after the first few hours are flown off and > >the > >restrictions are removed(ha.ha) > >This applies to Yak 55m, Sukhois, Zlins and such with original airworthiness > >certificates issued after the 1993 moratorium was rescinded. > >At issue is whether any flights (AND LANDING) to airports other than the > >"home > >base" are allowed without the governing FISDO being notified by fax or > >mail of > >THAT flight. The FAA's own "ORDER" 8130.27 says: > >"(3) Proficiency Area. A radius of 300 nautical miles from their designated > >home base airport ( See note at the end of this section) > >The note says: no class A or B airports during proficiency flights. > > > >1> How has your local FISDO interpreted this rule? Does this mean you can fly > >300 miles away for practice in a box and then 300 miles back but you cannot > >land anywhere. THIS IS LUDECROUS. This is what MY inspector has just relayed > >to me a the gospel. > >2> How are YOU interpreting it? > >3> Has this come up with your FISDO? > >4> Comments? > > > >Thanks for your input. > >If you would rather reply directly to me click this mail link: > >tek_doors at msn.com > >Or hit reply to the broadcast server for general discussion. > > > >Visit IAC 3's website at http://tek.w1.com/iachome.htm > >Or the Yak 55m website at http://tek.w1.com/yak55.htm > > > >BTW, Mark you calendars for the ATLANTA CONTEST on September 11-13 1997 Rain > >day 14th. > >Check the IAC 3 Website soon for contest info. Or contact contest director > >Lloyd Wittenburg (lwittenbur at aol.com)for details. See ya'll there! > > > > > > > >Van Thurston > >El Presidente: IAC3 Atlanta > >IAC 3074 > >Yakovlev 930803 > >Advanced I would also like to say that they are wanting paperwork.. The FEDs love paper work. They are good at paper work and not good at much else... There is really no use for them in our field of aviation except what they can create for themselves.... Phil