Acro Image

Aerobatics Server

ACRO E-mail Archive Thread: [IAC-L:895] RE: Alternate Sequences

[International Aerobatic Club] [Communications] [Aerobatics Images]

Disclaimer: These aerobatics pages are developed by individual IAC members and do not represent official IAC policy or opinion.

[Usage Statistics]


ACRO E-mail Archive Thread: [IAC-L:895] RE: Alternate Sequences



                


Thread: [IAC-L:895] RE: Alternate Sequences

Message: [IAC-L:895] RE: Alternate Sequences

Follow-Up To: ACRO Email list (for List Members only)

From: Harold James Hitchcock <hjhitchc at piper.hamline.edu>

Date: Mon, 08 Sep 1997 18:49:00 UTC


Message:

 
Interested Eagle owners would like to know!  Please pass this on.

Hal Hitchcock


On Sun, 7 Sep 1997, Doug Partl wrote:

> Date: Sun, 7 Sep 1997 20:48:28 -0500
> From: Doug Partl <DMCFF at classic.msn.com>
> Reply-To: iac-l at listproc.eracer.org
> To: Multiple recipients of list <iac-l at listproc.eracer.org>
> Subject: [IAC-L:879] RE: Alternate Sequences
> 
> Dave- I'm following your alternate idea with great interest- keep it up.
> I do have a question- I flew the IL Open in Matoon this weekend, took First in 
> Int. and IL State Title, finally, but a question came up as to the Pitts Cup- 
> I thought the issue, as stated right on the trophy as "Pitts Pilot"- and 
> doesn't state "Aviat Trophy"- as to who qualifies to win it, was settled a 
> while back and had to be a Pitts Pilot. Is this true or do Eagle, Husky Pilots 
> qualify? We had one Eagle do a great (90%) job, but I scored the highest in 
> Pitts- who gets it??? Let me know if you do!!! Mike Vaughn is sitting on the 
> trophy pending the correct answer.
> 
> Doug
> 
> ----------
> From: 	iac-l at listproc.eracer.org on behalf of Dave Lammers
> Sent: 	Friday, September 05, 1997 12:26 PM
> To: 	Multiple recipients of list
> Subject: 	[IAC-L:864] Alternate Sequences
> 
> Regarding the rules proposal for alternate sequences for use during
> lower ceiling conditions, I am preparing my final report for the rules
> committee and need your input.  Please review the article on page 40 of
> the July issue of S/A.
> 
> To date, I've had no objections to the Basic and Advanced sequences. 
> Several Citabria pilots have asked that the last three figures in the
> Sportsman sequence be reordered for energy reasons which has been
> accomplished, one intermediate pilot reported altitude problems which he
> thought would be fixed with practice, and the unlimited sequence is
> being reevaluated.
> 
> I need your input regarding A.) the concept in general, and B.) the
> proposed sequences.  ALL WRITTEN input will be included in this final
> report.  Many of you have given me verbal input of encouragement,
> however, I would appreciate a brief note for inclusion in the report. My
> deadline is September 15. 
> 
> Please send your e-mail comments to lammers.david at mcleod.net.
> 
> Thanks for your help!!!!!!!!!!!
> 
> Dave Lammers
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 



                


© Dr. Günther Eichhorn
Retired
Email Guenther Eichhorn