Acro Image

Aerobatics Server

ACRO E-mail Archive Thread: [IAC-L:897] RE: Alternate Sequences

[International Aerobatic Club] [Communications] [Aerobatics Images]

Disclaimer: These aerobatics pages are developed by individual IAC members and do not represent official IAC policy or opinion.

[Usage Statistics]

ACRO E-mail Archive Thread: [IAC-L:897] RE: Alternate Sequences


Thread: [IAC-L:897] RE: Alternate Sequences

Message: [IAC-L:897] RE: Alternate Sequences

Follow-Up To: ACRO Email list (for List Members only)

From: Jim Klick <klick at>

Date: Tue, 09 Sep 1997 07:44:21 UTC


 Just spoke to Carol at Aviat, and she said that it should go to the
highest scoring PRODUCTION Pitts aircraft. This has not been spelled out
in the past but it will be in the future.
Jim Klick

At 01:38 PM 9/8/97 -0500, you wrote:
>Interested Eagle owners would like to know!  Please pass this on.
>Hal Hitchcock
>On Sun, 7 Sep 1997, Doug Partl wrote:
>> Date: Sun, 7 Sep 1997 20:48:28 -0500
>> From: Doug Partl <DMCFF at>
>> Reply-To: iac-l at
>> To: Multiple recipients of list <iac-l at>
>> Subject: [IAC-L:879] RE: Alternate Sequences
>> Dave- I'm following your alternate idea with great interest- keep it up.
>> I do have a question- I flew the IL Open in Matoon this weekend, took
First in 
>> Int. and IL State Title, finally, but a question came up as to the Pitts
>> I thought the issue, as stated right on the trophy as "Pitts Pilot"- and 
>> doesn't state "Aviat Trophy"- as to who qualifies to win it, was settled a 
>> while back and had to be a Pitts Pilot. Is this true or do Eagle, Husky
>> qualify? We had one Eagle do a great (90%) job, but I scored the highest in 
>> Pitts- who gets it??? Let me know if you do!!! Mike Vaughn is sitting on the 
>> trophy pending the correct answer.
>> Doug
>> ----------
>> From: 	iac-l at on behalf of Dave Lammers
>> Sent: 	Friday, September 05, 1997 12:26 PM
>> To: 	Multiple recipients of list
>> Subject: 	[IAC-L:864] Alternate Sequences
>> Regarding the rules proposal for alternate sequences for use during
>> lower ceiling conditions, I am preparing my final report for the rules
>> committee and need your input.  Please review the article on page 40 of
>> the July issue of S/A.
>> To date, I've had no objections to the Basic and Advanced sequences. 
>> Several Citabria pilots have asked that the last three figures in the
>> Sportsman sequence be reordered for energy reasons which has been
>> accomplished, one intermediate pilot reported altitude problems which he
>> thought would be fixed with practice, and the unlimited sequence is
>> being reevaluated.
>> I need your input regarding A.) the concept in general, and B.) the
>> proposed sequences.  ALL WRITTEN input will be included in this final
>> report.  Many of you have given me verbal input of encouragement,
>> however, I would appreciate a brief note for inclusion in the report. My
>> deadline is September 15. 
>> Please send your e-mail comments to lammers.david at
>> Thanks for your help!!!!!!!!!!!
>> Dave Lammers


© Dr. Günther Eichhorn
Email Guenther Eichhorn